ILPA Briefing for the Modern Slavery Bill can be found alongside the Kalayaan briefing here
. The ILPA briefing covers:
Lords’ Amendment 45: Legal Aid for Victims of Slavery, Servitude and Forced labour
Lords’ Amendments 46 to 57 Child Trafficking Advocates in particular Lords amendment 47, to which ILPA is opposed
Lords’ Amendment 72: Overseas domestic workers and the Home Secretary’s motion to disagree and proposed amendments in lieu
A debate on Lord Hylton’s amendment restoring to domestic workers the right to change employers is taking place tomorrow. There is still time (just) to let your MP know your views before the debate.
The SSHD’s approach to waiving human rights application fees was limited to those who were literally destitute. This presented an obstacle to people who were overstayers, with limited financial support from family or friends, to applying for leave to remain in the UK based on their Human Rights because they were not considered destitute.
Those who were not destitute but did not have sufficient financial resources, had to find some way to pay the relevant fees, which often meant getting themselves into debt. A case called R (Carter) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, found here
, disagreed with this approach.
The court decided that if the entitlement to getting a fee waiver is seen by the SSHD as being limited to people who are actually destitute, that’s unlawful. If the SSHD decides not to waive the fee, then this should be challenged.
The SSHD issued the following news article today: ‘Fee waiver applications for FLR(O) and FLR (FP): information for applicants
Updated 3 December 2014
The Home Office is reviewing its fee waiver policy in light of the judgment of the Administrative Court in the case of R (Carter) v Secretary of State for the Home Department  EWHC 2603 (Admin). The Home Office’s appeal to the Court of Appeal against that judgment has been withdrawn.
The previous policy has been withdrawn. Until a new policy is published, the Home Office will use interim arrangements, so that applicants who would have met the requirements under the previous policy will continue to be granted a fee waiver.
Applicants who would not have qualified for a fee waiver under the previous policy will have their applications placed temporarily on hold. We expect the new policy to be published by spring 2015.
This means that:
1. Applications for a fee waiver can continue to be submitted on the Appendix 1 FLR(FP) FLR(O) form and will be considered.
2. Applications which meet the terms of the previous policy will be given a fee waiver and their FLR(O) or FLR(FP) form will go on to be considered in the usual way.
3. Applications for a fee waiver which do not meet the terms of the previous policy and which would have fallen to be refused will be on hold until the revised policy is announced. They will then be considered under the terms of the revised policy. In the meantime, applicants may write to us with any additional evidence that they meet the terms of the previous fee waiver policy.
4. Alternatively, applicants may choose to apply again on an FLR(FP) or FLR(O) form along with the appropriate fee.
5. Once the revised policy is announced we intend to review all fee waiver applications on hold based on the new policy, and any further evidence submitted, and give applicants a final decision on their application.’
This issue is likely to proceed to the Court of Appeal.
The UKBA contracted a private company called Capita to track down illegal migrants.
Capita are currently sending out text messages to persons suspected of being in the UK illegally. The messages ask the individuals to leave the UK as soon as possible. A BBC report
confirmed Capita are sending messages in error, such errors including asking a British woman, and a man with a valid visa (who has also invested £1M in a UK business) to leave. Capita responded by saying that some information provided by the UKBA, upon which they base their messages, may be inaccurate.
Not withstanding the fact that the UKBA passed on incorrect data, this action may also be contrary to their duties under the Data Protection Act. Relevant support groups have been in touch with Ofcom and the Information Commission, as well as informing the UKBA that they may be liable to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act.
If you receive a text message you should complain to the UKBA via their online form found here
More when we have it.
The Deputy Prime Minister gave a keynote speech on 10 May 2011 to mark the 60th anniversary of the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and the formation of the Refugee Council in the UK.
The DPM accepted that there is still more progress to be made, but praised the UK's role in human rights issues.
He hoped that the UK should aim for the 'most compassionate, efficient, dignified asylum system in the world.' He pointed out that half of asylum cases are now decided within a month, and promised to ensure the system is fair as it becomes faster.
He said that just as important as helping refugees was taking a stand against regimes that pose a threat to peace and restricts the liberty of their people — he highlighted Burma, North Korea, Libya and Syria.
The BNP proposed to offer non-white British people £50,000 to leave "overcrowded" Britain and return to the land of their ancestors, the party's leader Nick Griffin said. Read More...
The Liberal Democrats propose to end the imprisonment of children in immigration detention centers, they call the imprisonment “unnecessary...inhuman... Read More...
The PM, in a speech delivered in Shoreditch, East London, explained how the government is transforming the way it deals with immigration through its ‘controlled and fair’ points-based system. He went onto say: Read More...